For They All Had Itchy Ears, and Hied Thus to the Internet, for its Dependable Function as Echo-Chamber

Monsieur Gilliam, Europhile, has very fine attention portée aux détails, and indeed seems up to his ears in the Business of them

As i am quite a fairly big boy with a big boy's surplus of time, i read a couple of articles on "power laws and scale-less systems," the efficiency and data-distribution policies of the brain and in particular the visual cortex. Link below. I accept that that article and its subject matter are difficult to understand for most people, including me, and may not be worth your time. It takes a bit of work and focused reading, depending, maybe, on how much science journalism, remorselessly idiomatic academic literature, or philosophy one takes in their diet. Google is as ever your friend in attempting to read abstruse material outside your ken or "pay-grade." But apart from neuroscience and brain-mapping being interesting material for even lay study, this article deals with ideas you can apply to your own life, or at least your own areas of curiosity. I consider this all in relation to Media Studies, and as a potentially helpful answer to questions i mull about crowd psychology and current social engineering efforts. There are also dreadful A.I. implications for these findings, and they'll of course come to a dreadful fruition, within most of our lifetimes. Anything that allows The Terminator or Google or Mug-Mag to make more perfectly human-like determinations is probably bad.

Various trivial details attendant to the events of September 11, 2001. Observe the Observer. Observe how much Hollywood insisted on playing with the props, both globe and monolith.

"Carsen Stringer of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute says that the level of dimensionality in the brain’s representations is tuned to stop trivial details in images from overwhelming their bigger features."

As far as that media studies suggestion of mine: To what extent can our minds, when consuming news media in the aggregate, distinguish between propaganda or scientific thought-manipulation on the one hand, and rational, discretely objective data on the other? Leaving aside the drab consideration of whether the individual is intelligent enough to understand what legitimately constitutes "objective data..." How can we perceive differences between supposed Narrative logic and actual Forensic Logic? Between the passions of a given, individual news story, and the contextual dictates that should govern how we conceive of and interpret a broader collection of similar news stories? I'm quite sure that help is needed from a green screen and willing toadies such as all of the NYT, Wa-Po, and WSJ columnists, and all the tele-pundits on the spectrum from Anderson Cooper to Sean Hannity, to get so many of us to be overwhelmed by Narrative as opposed to guided by proportional, case by case forensic logic.

In other words, what dark neuroscience is responsible for seeing to it that the majority of Americans do not know about the sorcery of Hollywood in foreshadowing and also blatantly hat-tipping towards the imminent September 11 Mega-ritual? It seems that some form of denial is in effect here, at this point. It would be interesting to know the hard statistics on the number of people who eventually became aware of "the notion of" this occult ceremonial reality but then simply rejected it and opted to do no research into such a mind-halting and fascinating subject. And for the rest of the public who remains categorically unaware of the Mega-ritual aspect and all that it says about Hollywood Culture and underbelly, (and thus about corporate America) as well as occult religion, i will have to suggest that a certain amount of less responsible denial is at work, or put another way, of mind control. One can call it "cultural mind control" or one can ascribe a more direct, methodical, prescribed agenda and blame to a culprit behind this. These are differences without much distinction, and getting very tedious for their semantics, imo. Culture is certainly not always organic, and this is the main point.

In other, other words, what clever misrepresentation efforts have been required of the combined apparatus of news media, state/government primers and officials, and law enforcement, to in the end find so many people in the USA ignorant of just how many of these many "mass shootings" are fake? They are in fact Gladio-style synthetic terror operations that hobble out of some factory looking very unsure of themselves, reeking of trite narrative scenario-flaws and memes, and pinned on patsies with glassy eyes or that old auto-termination feature. We should all be very well-schooled in what a false-flag mass-shooting looks like, except for that the high-strung, emotional narrative-hogwash of the Obama Period, i truly believe, crippled and hollowed out much of our detective instincts and common sense. Indeed, from 2000 on, we had to endure 16 consecutive fucking years of practical CIA and black magic bonesmen-type presidential rule, and nothing that came from or occurred during this period should surprise us at all. One can even view the totality of "Pizza Gate" as another lewd operation to distract the public and also get them attacking one another, all while placing preferred occult themes of child prey, sacrifice, and sexual abuse before the public imagination for over a year. The very fact alone that Alefantis appeared on prime-time news TV and in a privileged op-ed in the Wa-Po to acquit himself indicates less to me that he was being protected by fraternal care and communal self-interest as that he played a role in a long-game production that from its beginning involved the cooperation of major news media organs. What's more, as with the Q phenomenon, it isn't especially sound reasoning to place much faith in any (decentralized or quite anonymously driven) info-distribution effort simply because it is from 4-chan or Reddit, etc, and not from an established agency, network or paper.

In the deluge of media coverage over all these poor dead celebrities strangled by doorknobs, (about whom some credibly open-minded people debate whether or not they actually died or were given the golden ticket; it's necessary in this particular meta-neural and epistemological-type discussion to note this) how did it become just a power-law-obedient, decayed-trickle data point, that the matter of such connected phenomena is on its damn face ridiculous? That the murders are a patent absurdity which demand public inquiry into conspiracy? But you get no inquiry, and we express no interest, let alone outrage, and in some sense why should we, down here? Just more door-knob and elevator deaths, isn't it awful and in some ways just delicious. Even in spite of the valid research and speculation into Hollywood star-whackers, occult ritual murder, and the specific relation some of these stars had to questions about child and human trafficking. All of which information flows freely at all times through the internet and the zeitgeist of "alternative thinking and research."

It's obvious now that an entirely new industry has developed in response to the likelihood that many of us are getting very close to waking up to such Trivial Details, and rather simultaneously, at that, given the special form and practice of the internet. The new industry is a hybrid of cranky psycho-analysis and the meat-headed sanctimonies of those who receive fine paychecks to remind the public of how ignorant an ever-growing number of them are. How many times now does a Parkland-style op need to be followed up with fiery denunciation of "conspiracy theorists," and how many think pieces have you personally read over the past 10 years which describe the pat, suspiciously convenient and hackneyed "scientific/psychological" reasons for why more and more people are becoming conspiracy theorists? All that seedy, poor-faith, logically unsupportable rubbish about unstable people who need to overlay Order onto a world of Chaos, by creating conspiracies where they plum do not exist, massa, yessuh.

Trivial Analog Detail of the Looming Variety, flanked by three sets of twinned objects

Perhaps then, we shouldn't be so horrified by the idea that some external force, agency, steering group, or disembodied phrase of your choice, is attempting to prevent us from seeing the details. The messy details. Perhaps these forces have long known more about the workings of the crowd-mind and the distinct ego-brain than even the scientists they are funding at this or that Howard Hughes medical research center. Trivial, spattery, nuts and bolts, vagina- and penis-magic details like dates, and anniversaries, and zodiac data; street and people names, the numbers on hotel doors, address signs, etc. Ephemera like premonitory Kubrickian monoliths cropping up exactly at major sites of drama and suffering, right ahead of schedule. Small data points like clusters of especially anti-Christian wrong-doing right near sacred occult holidays celebrating witchcraft and death worship. To put that generically; i know how some people resent insufficiently precise language, and love Samhain.

As hovering and expansive as earth problems are, i'm more and more coming to view the question of specific blame as a waste of precious temporal units. And really there does appear to be so much blame to spread about.

Details, details, Simpsons. German edition of Non-11 Mega-ritual Duck Tales Comic Special; it says the same thing in Roman Catholic and Amerikan

 

Apparently, God is Into Details

To my way of supposing, this subject of (relational/proportional) power laws and the ?brain/mind?'s way of conserving energy in receiving stimuli, may also bear closely on the mysteries of divination, prophecy, and ESP. In keeping with my current biblical spirit: part of our consciousness may be wired only to accept and interpret the abundant wheat of material existence, while a lesser or less currently discovered domain may deal in the more mystical chaff and data: those less confined by physical laws or concepts. Chaff here being not at all worthless, but rather, undesirable to our would-be masters. It seems increasingly probable that whoever designs news coverage as well as the actual, visible format of news delivery since around 2000, seeks in the first place to manipulate and gloss over facts and viewpoints that are undesirable to them, and often directly contradictory to the collected conclusions and analyses of mainstream society and The State...and in the second place to feed us distracting and swooshy red and blue graphics that bedazzle the logical mind, it is Said. I feel that it's proven. The ethic involved in the distracting and binary combative format, and graphics displays, and constant ticker-taping of on-screen news programming, is arguably (and arguably, by definition and intent) Unethical. It seeks to lower the defenses of the rational mind while news-organizers slip into it these lunatic mythologies like Dylan Roof, Stephen Paddock, the idea that the moon is not some mysterious artificial construct, James Holmes, Adam Lanza, et al, and the entire events of Charlottesville and Nein-11. The immorality behind the larger, collectively broadcast effort (from CNN to BBC to FOX, symbolically speaking) of blandly manipulating/decontextualizing the narrative construction of a given psy-op or major news story, or even the "isolated" election-cycle murder of a pretty white woman by an immigrant, or the solstice gang-murder of a young man on camera, by machete: that larger, cultural, power law effort also lowers your critical intellectual defenses, but does so over the course of your lifetime, and at an almost exponential pace, it really does seem. Since around 2000.

Anything that can be done to degrade our intuition, our rational faculty, and our powers of abstract, more mystical thought, is not only being done, but ritually attended to and encouraged, and studied both with public monies and resources, and without them.

Very old and detailed sheep's liver model

The Babylonian-era tablet pictured here is a model of a sheep's liver. For practice. Everyone knows how much a freshly and ritually killed lamb's liver can tell about the state of society and the future. A well-known microcosmic bit of bloody heurism, in which the direction of lines and degree of node-possession in one smaller life-form can indicate larger shifts or eventualities in the life of the designated priest's society, or of its King, which is a very big life-form said to have become practically extinct. Helpful links suggest that this business of Power Laws is conceptually linked to that of Fractals, so. A fractal can serve as an analogy for the Hermetic Maxim.

This is a fractal

So are these, again, apparently

The Bureau of Printing and Engraving is surely baffled by this random accumulation of sequential details in their products. It's absolutely just a rumor that this Bureau has contained many generations of Freemasons in its employ.